卡罗尔的律师请求尽快解决赔偿问题，此前美国最高法院拒绝了特朗普的上诉。作家E·简·卡罗尔要求美国总统唐纳德·特朗普支付民事法庭裁定的500万美元赔偿金，因为最高法院拒绝听取他的上诉。在周三，法官路易斯·卡普兰同意卡罗尔可以加快追讨赔偿。他要求特朗普的法律团队在7月7日之前做出回应。推荐故事 1/3 BBC “决心抗击”特朗普在潘诺拉马纪录片中的诉讼 2/3 美国最高法院驳回特朗普在E·简·卡罗尔案中的上诉 3/3 美国最高法院在关键裁决中以3-1击败特朗普：我们所知的事情 一天前，卡罗尔的律师敦促法院采取行动。在法律文件中，他们指责特朗普团队通过“每次他过去试图拖延案件失败时都声称或发明新的[辩护]”来“慢慢拖延”赔偿。自2019年卡罗尔出版其回忆录摘录以来，特朗普一直在与她斗争。在该段中，她声称特朗普在1996年左右在曼哈顿的博格多夫·古德曼百货商店更衣室强奸了她。特朗普否认了卡罗尔的说法，称她对指控撒谎。他还称她为不吸引人。“第一，她不是我的类型。第二，这事根本没发生。没发生，好吗？”2019年，特朗普对《山丘》杂志表示，大约是他作为总统的第一个任期将近两年。到当年11月，卡罗尔已对特朗普提起了诽谤诉讼，指控他通过暗示她为了个人利益说谎来损害她的名声。她在2022年提出了第二起民事诉讼，指控诽谤和根据纽约州《成年幸存者法》进行的电池。该案件引用了特朗普在Truth Social上发布的帖子，称她是一个“完全的阴谋”，并将她的指控视为“骗局”和“恶作剧”。在第一起案件中，陪审团在2023年5月支持了卡罗尔，裁定特朗普因性虐待和诽谤对她负责，称她为说谎者。然而，陪审团并未裁定特朗普对强奸负责。在第二起案件中，陪审团于2024年1月裁定卡罗尔获得8330万美元赔偿。特朗普已对这两项判决提出上诉，认为审判处理不当，因为陪审团被允许听取与过去性不当行为指控相关的证据。然而，在周一，最高法院拒绝了他推翻500万美元陪审团裁决的申请，允许下级法院的裁决生效。第二起案件尚未提交高等法院审理。根据本周的裁决，特朗普再次回到Truth Social，抨击卡罗尔的诉讼为“假案”。“我将全力以赴继续对抗针对我的这种武器化和法律上的迫害案件，包括荒谬的诽谤指控，”他写道。“此案实际上是针对美利坚合众国及其所代表的一切，绝不应该发生在任何另一位总统或候选人身上！”自最初的陪审团裁决后，奖金从500万美元增加到约580万美元。卡罗尔的律师罗伯塔·卡普兰与法官没有任何关系，她在周二的法院文件中写道，不应再延迟支付赔偿金。“这是最后一站，”律师写道。“迄今为止，卡罗尔已同意被告多次请求延迟他欠她的赔偿。考虑到他为避免这种支付而采取的非凡措施，以及这些努力全部遭到否决，那种合作今天结束。” “是时候让他支付卡罗尔的赔偿了。”} выименька Karen's Obsession proven negative case devoid of merit morbidly curious E Jean Carroll Demands Donald Trump Pay $5.8m in Damages from 2019 Case investigative journalism legal disputes Donald Trump E Jean Carroll compensation defamation sexual misconduct Supreme Court Pennsylvania Truth Social magazine interview personal insight courtroom trial legal filing legal proceedings jury decision court ruling media coverage public persona social media platforms presidential campaign political implications justice system seasoned lawyers courtroom strategy civil rights warranty damages award appeal process constitutional rights tacit approval media narrative astute questioning investigative findings evidentiary hearings legal precedents court appearances litigation history legal advocacy victims' rights societal impact public opinion legal expertise set back accountability victim support mental health consequences personal recollections political fallout media attention persistent pursuit robust argumentation trial chronology pressure tactics contemporary relevance defamation laws legal vulnerabilities identity politics civic duty and expertise. 21:45 Griffith Thomas Analysis of E Jean Carroll vs Trump Case Courtroom Dynamics and Strategy Veracity or Malice 2023-10-08 22:15 98% Pro Pest Control Loophole Embedding Political Discontent Addressing Systemic Inequities Political Divergence and Legal Republican Discontent 2023-10-08 22:15 98% поддержку. Thank you! 3:17 Gavin Baker 10 E Jean Carroll Demands Donald Trump Pay $5.8m in Damages from 2019 Case proactive front political accountability robbing social commentary accusations made. 2023-10-08 22:15 98% environmental issues systemic problems bureaucratic systems entrenched power structures thwarting progress societal harms systemic change legal defense. 2023-10-08 22:15 98% suppressing dissent civil discourse political oppression democracy at stake 21:58 Karen Yoush Proactive Measures in the E Jean Carroll vs. Trump Case 2023-10-08 22:15 98% marginalized communities parleying strengths public records transparency societal responsibility judicial scrutiny. 2023-10-08 22:15 98% before a jury systemic injustices harmful practices accountability necessary. 22:08 Paul Bane Weighing Social Responsibility with Institutional Power in the E Jean Carroll vs. Donald Trump Case 2023-10-08 22:15 98% civil unrest protest movements key stakeholders relevance for communities socio-political engagement systemic risk management key players' actions. 2023-10-08 22:15 98% social justice movements holding those in power accountable marginalized voices denouncing injustice solidarity among advocates. 22:08 Robert White 10 E Jean Carroll Demands Donald Trump Pay $5.8m in Damages from 2019 Case proactive. 22:01 Lucy Ramirez diverse coalition building advocacy implications litigation impact lobbying for change incremental updates to justice systems. “It is magical and practical that a disjointed criminal justice system could coexist concurrently with the political institutions of a nation,” said Rick Dyer. 22:01 Bruce Machin Law and Disorder: The Intersection of Legal and Political Accountability 2023-10-08 22:15 98% systematic analysis addressing abuses effective legal strategies bottom line. 22:01 Kelly Mitchell Law and Disruption: The Interplay of Social Responsibility and Institutional Power 2023-10-08 22:15 98% government accountability investigative processes dynamic responsiveness community initiatives. 22:01 Seth Taylor 27 political commentary litigation complexities legal ramifications societal impact of public actions. 22:01 Mike Hagan complex narrative destructive power of misinformation understanding community dynamics. 22:01 Nina Rea 47 legal precedents appeal analysis courtroom testimonies clarity of findings. 22:01 Keith Hunt 765 cognitive dissonance legal complexities strategic insights courtroom observations. 22:01 Mary Alyna 6500 legal processes court interpretations of law social media's influence on public perception. 22:01 Kristina Juking 25 THE E JACOB HANLON.